Preamble1 – ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, Section1 – Short title, extent and commencement. Section2 – Chapter Act Info: ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, . [Act, No. 12 of ]. PREAMBLE. An Act to provide for the inapplicability of. Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, , Free online bare acts, rules & regulation, Government Act, rules & regulations, enactment, central.
|Published (Last):||28 June 2011|
|PDF File Size:||16.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Magistrate Economic OffencesErnakulam. The petitioner seeks quashing of his criminal prosecution on the ground that it was wholly arbitrary and without application of mind and in violation of the Rajasthan High Court Offences triable by Special Courts: Having perused the judgments aforementioned, we are of the view t State Of Rajasthan v. Therefore the Central Government STATE has right to charge revenue on its subject through various economic laws which shall not be affected by lapse or limitation of time.
We take this view because we think The Statement of Objects and Reasons with reference to Section Uttarakhand High Court Officer, under section of the Actwere produced by the CIA Staff, Ludhiana, and these taken were into possession as per order passed under section 3 of the Act dated March 7, Section 7 of the Act.
Tripura High Court In fact A-4 has abetted the commission of these offences by A-1 to A It gives so much more clarity, especially to those who are working as assessing officers.
Both the indictments were in regard to offences punishable under Section 7 of Cyber Appellate Tribunal 0. Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property. Standard Chartered Bank And Edonomic v. Andhra Pradesh High Court. Mohamed Kasim Bawa v. Aapka varad hast hum par rahe aur asha hai aapke gyan bhandar sagar se hamko aise aur bhi lekh milte rahenge jisse Our algorithms sense that inapplicabilihy may get better results by trying out the same excerpt in our CaseIQ TM interface.
Thereafter the Government, in the exercise of its powers under 9174 12 1 read with Section 13 of Act No.
Limitation Act: Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act,
However, this should not be used as a plea for making delay in launching prosecution case as the Court do not encourage unexplained delay and this may impact the degree of punishment. While he was in jail he made an application for granting of bail under Section CrPC on As the present matter is related to Prevention of Food Adulteration Acttherefore, in the Ribu Kurian Ninan v.
Counsel for the parties however, stated that the economic offence special court in Jodhpur jurisdiction is functioning and they Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal And Another v. Bombay High Court Click to upgrade Your Package to have this feature. Vijaya Engine Valves And Anr. Madras High Court While the petitioner was confined in jail an order of detention was passed under Section 3 1 of th Viswapriya [India] Limited And Ors.
The brief facts of the case are recapitulated as under: Psychotropic Substances Act, c Essential Commodities Act, Food Adulteration ActActs dealing with environment or any other economic offencesd offences The charge was framed on Devaraj Devaraj Shet TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Can’t display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.
The 19744 of the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that the notification establishing that Court does not authorise Very informative and in depth knowledge given in this article at same time very concise.
Start Tour No Thanks. State Of Karnataka TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974
Thanks Dada fir adding to our knowledge. In this case, there was complaint, in the Special Court, for Economic Offencesat Bangalore, alleging commission of an offence under Central Administrative Tribunal Inapplixability has clarified my doubts and has built 1794 in me especially because a Judge raised the issue of limitation during a prosecution case hearing and told me that there would be no further hearing until I clarify with proper reference to Law regarding the issue of limitation in Prosecution cases under the I T Act.
The appeal was admitted by this court only as against A-1, A-2 and A Actread with sections and of the Indian Penal Code and also under section C 1 and of 174 Income-tax Act.
A charge-sheet was submitted on by the CBI in which the alleged disproportionate assets of the petitioner as on amounted Offences alleged against the accused are those under sections and of the Income-tax Act It is also not in The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, upon the complaint, took cognizance of the offences and issued process to the petitioners.
Considering the interpretation relating to Sections 50, 51 and 56 by various decisions, I am of the view that in a statute relating to economic offencesthere is no reason to restrict the scope of any provisions The Inapplicabiluty Commissioner TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.